Proposed Facilities Policy Violation Procedure
	(1 September 1994, jnw@cis.ufl.edu)

1. Determination of Occurrence of an Offense.

	Computer System Administrators are responsible for
	determining when it is probable that a facilities policy
	violation has occurred, and in determining those persons
	who have probably committed such violations.

2. Recording Judgments of Guily.

	Record of judgments of guilt in facilities policy
	violation cases shall be maintained by the department
	chairman.

3. Procedure to be Followed By System Administrator Upon Determining
	a Violation has Probably Occurred.	
	
	If a system administrator determines there is cause to
	believe a facilities policy violation has taken place,
	that administrator is empowered to take action which
	may include suspending all account privileges for any
	computer account that is being employed to violate
	policy, until one of the following shall occur:
	
	i) It is deemed that the violation was probably the result of
		actions by a person other than the account owner and
		appropriate actions have been taken to prevent further
		abuse.

	ii) The account owner is reasonably suspected of commiting a
		policy violation, that person is a faculty or staff member,
		and the matter has been referred in writing to the
		Department Chairman or other appropriate supervisor.

	iii) The account owner is reasonably suspected of commiting the
		policy violation, that person is a student, and the
		student has either completed a Facilities Policy Violation
		Summary Adjudication Form prepared by the system
		administrator, or had a hearing before the Facilities
		Policy Violation Committee (hereinafter referred to as
		the Committee).

		The Facilities Policy Violation Summary Adjudication
		Form may only be used if the suspected policy violation
		if the student has not been deemed guilty in a previous
		facilities policy violation proceeding (as determined
		by consulting departmental records).

		The Committee shall hear the case including testimony
		of the student, system administrator, and any other
		witnesses the student or system administrator wish to
		bring and who are determined by the Committee to be
		able to give testimony that has bearing on the case.
		The Committee shall be responsible for determining what,
		if any, academic sanctions are appropriate remedies in
		the case in question.

		Appeal of Committee decisions is to the Academic Dean
		of the College in which the student is enrolled.