Spaf does research on issues relating to increasing the reliability of computer systems, and the consequences of computer failures. This has included work with software debugging and testing, and reliable distributed computing systems. His current work is focused on computer security and on issues liability and professional ethics. His work in security has resulted in many oft-cited papers and several books, as well as several widely-used security tools.
Gene on the editorial boards of many journals, include "Computers & Security," "Journal of Information Systems Security," "Artificial Life," the "Virus Bulletin," and "Networks Security." Professor Spafford is a Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and is a member of the IEEE Computer Society. He is a member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and is chair of the ACM Self-Assessment Committee, chair of the ISEF Awards Committee, and a member of the SIG Technical Standards Committee. He is chair of IFIP WG 11.4 on Network Security. He is a member of the advisory board of the National Research Center on Computers and Society, and is a member of the Usenix Association. He is also a member of the steering committee for the international Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams.
In his spare time, Spaf wonders why he has no spare time.
Meanwhile, there is a dark side to all of this. Hackers, viruses, software pirates, and even electronic "hit men" are also prowling the Internet. As more commerce and information comes on-line, we may be creating more of a threat to ourselves than we are creating a benefit.
This presentation will give an overview of some of the computer crime-related problems being created by the growth of the Internet. We will discuss some of the defenses, and some of the limitations and obstacles, facing our future use of networked services.
This presentation will outline two new approaches to intrusion detection being conducted in the COAST Laboratory. One is based on a new classification of misuse activity, and the other is based on a multiple-agent approach. The benefits, drawbacks, and application of each method are discussed.