chaudhari
rating:1
Shortcomings:
1. Missing message format for server fault detection by users.
2. Message format is not clearly expressed. 
3. Reconnection message missing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reza
rating: 4.5
Shortcomings: none
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
team 01
rating: 3
shortcomings:
1. no failure recovery messages sent by user
2. Message for finding a user must include the trace path.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
team 2:
rating:3
cons:
Detection of failure by Server is not handled explicitly. Only when a command is received by a server from its agent, will it come to know if any of its neighboring servers is dead.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
team 3:
rating:3
no shortcommings
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
team 4:
rating:3

cons: 

-"Neighbor Disconnect" message is not not required as status of neighbouring servers is taken care by periodic server ping.
-<agent alias> has to be added to the "Neighbor Ping" message format.


pros: Well documented.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

team 5:
rating:3

cons:
-name collision not handled.
-message format is not mentioned explicitly.
-message for sending agentlist of a server to its neighboring server is missing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

team 7:
rating:3.5

cons:
pros: 3-way handshake for server discovery is appreciable.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
team 8: 3.5
rating:


pros:well documented
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
team 9:
rating:3

cons:
-name collision not handled.
-common information like exchange of Agentlist and list of neighbors is not handled.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

team 10
rating: 3
Shortcomings: 
1.  Detection of server failure by a client is not handled by any of the messages. 
2. Rearranging of servers is not taken care of when the network breaks up on crash of a server.
3. Search message format is not well formed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
team 11
rating: 3
Shortcomings: 
1. Detection of failure by Server is not handled explicitly. Only when a command is received by a server from its agent, will it come to know if any of its neighboring servers is dead.
2. Rearranging of servers is not taken care of when the network breaks up on crash of a server.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
team13
Rating: 2
Shortcomings: 1. Server Name collision not handled. The type of communication for server discovery not specified.
2. Server recovery to get back users is not implemented as was discussed in the class. The recovered server must directly contact the agent without asking to its neighbor.
3. Failure recovery messages sent by Agent not specified.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
team15
rating: 2
Shortcomings:
1. Message format is not clearly expressed. 
2. Type of error is not specified explicitly.
3. Message format for FIND cannot achieve its purpose.