CGS3065 DEBATES FALL 2009

SECTION 7099   Dr. G. Haskins

Select a topic and point of view from the following list. Several topics have a starting point for research. Come prepared to convince your colleagues, and to support your arguments with FACTS, and well-reasoned opinions. Students not on the panel for that day should be ready to question vigorously the panelists positions.

Please remember that a SUBSTANTIAL PORTION of your grade in this class is determined by participation (or not) in classroom discussions.

TENTATIVE DATE, TOPIC, & READINGS

**11/5** Whether, following structural failure of a commercial Building which results in loss of life, the fault should be placed on one of the professionals involved in the project? hypothetical

ROLES

  • ENGINEER: Samuel S.
  • COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER: Colin W.
  • EXPERT: Edson
  • SOFTWARE DEVELOPER: Stuart H.

**11/5** Whether the 1st Amendment protects the producer and distributor of a “dogfight” video prosecuted under a Federal statute prohibiting depictions of “cruelty to animals?”

PERSPECTIVES (2 EACH)

·                The 1st Amendment protects even speech which we may find repugnant  Harish B.; Graham C.
·                This is a particularly abhorrent  form of speech which deserves no protection Dustin S.

**11/10**Whether a 2005 act  which uses the language of the 1934 Telecommunications Act in assigning criminal penalties to anyone who “utilizes any device or software … to originate …communications that are transmitted in whole, or in part, by the internet…without disclosing his identity and with the intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person…”,  achieves its intended purpose of bringing VOIP under these prohibitions, or is it too broadly drawn?

PERSPECTIVES (2 EACH)

·        There is no reason to treat VOIP differently from traditional telephony, and this statute is well drawn Matthew Mc.; Jaymes S.

·        This statute is poorly drawn and will have consequences well beyond the intent of Congress Tyler Lovelly

**11/12** Whether people who would never consider shoplifting a music CD from a store, are correct when they argue that there is difference between that, and downloading the same material for free off a P2P network?

PERSPECTIVES (2 EACH)

  • IT’S NOT THE SAME: Steven R., Erik K.

·         STEALING IS STEALING  Mike G.; James S.

**11/12** Whether an anti-abortion group whose website listed the names, addresses, and license plate numbers of doctors who performed abortions, suggested stalking the doctors, and updated the site by graying  out the names of those who had been wounded, and striking through those who had been murdered, yet claimed they were only collecting dossiers in the hope that sometime in the future the doctors could be held accountable for “crimes against humanity,”  would be protected by the 1st Amendment in a civil lawsuit involving their website?

PERSPECTIVES (2 EACH)

·         Protected  Marlies S.; Camilo C.

  • Not protected: Alex K.

**11/17** Whether Mr. Jonah Nonimous is correct when he says: "I'm a law-abiding citizen. I pay my taxes promptly. I have a loving, caring wife, and two responsible teenage sons. I close the door when I take a shower, and discuss family matters only with my family. I don't care if other people review my college grades or my income statements.  I don’t care if the NSA intercepts my communications without cause or warrant.  I have nothing to hide.  Privacy laws which “protect” us from government, corporate, or private snooping are unnecessary. Only individuals who have something to hide need them."

PERSPECTIVES (UP TO 2 EACH)

·                I'M WITH JONAH: Boone C.; Chad F.
·                JONAH'S WRONG:  Alejandro M.; Reuben H.

**11/19** Whether a social networking site such as MySpace should be held civilly liable for negligent failure to take reasonable safety measures to keep young children off of its site, and for providing a communication path between a sexual predator and a 13 year old girl who represented that she was 18 when she joined MySpace.com?

PERSPECTIVES (UP TO 2 EACH)

  • Social networking sites, like any other type of business enterprise, must make reasonable efforts to protect the public  Sabine G.; Michael W.
  • NO, MySpace should no more be liable than the FedEx driver who unknowingly delivers a pound of cannabis  Khalid I.; Nora L.

 

**11/19** Millions of American homes are equipped with wireless networks.  If the network is not made secure, any nearby computer with a wireless card can use the network.  The range of home wireless networks often extends into neighboring homes, particularly in apartment complexes.  If your neighbor’s wireless network extends into your home, is it wrong (legally or morally) to use the network to get free internet access?

PERSPECTIVES (2 EACH)

  • OF COURSE IT IS: Jorge A.; Mark M.
  • NO, IT’S PERFECTLY REASONABLE, AND LEGAL: Jesse P.; Michael D.

 **11/24** Whether a 21-year old  Egyptian-born man, who produces an English-language,  pro-al-Qaeda blog from his parents’ home in North Carolina, in which  he relays multimedia productions of violent Islamic groups, lists hundreds of secret site where readers can obtain the latest blood-drenched insurgent videos from Iraq, and translates scholarly treatises into English, including one recently which argued  for violent jihad, should be allowed to keep his site online, or should it be shut down and the man prosecuted?

PERSPECTIVES (UP TO 2 EACH)

  • THERE ARE FREE SPEECH AND OTHER REASONS TO ALLOW HIM TO KEEP HIS SITE UP: William G.; Diana F.
  • NO, HIS SITE SHOULD BE TAKEN DOWN AND HE SHOULD BE PROSECUTED FOR VARIOUS CRIMES: William H.; Scott P.
  •  

**12/1** Whether Digital Rights Management (DRM) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) are needed to protect the rights of creative artists, or whether they are not serving that purpose?

PERSPECTIVES (2 EACH)

  • PRO DRM/DMCA: Spencer P.; Josh R.
  • ANTI DRM/DMCA: Zach H.; Matt G.

**12/3** A plane makes an emergency crash landing on a deserted tropical island.  Two dozen survivors must fend for themselves until help arrives.  All of them are from large cities, and none has camping experience.  They find it impossible to gather enough food, and everyone begins losing weight.  One person spends a lot of time by himself, and figures out how to catch fish.  He brings the fish back to camp.  Others ask him to teach them how to catch fish.  He refuses, but offers to share the fish with the other passengers, as long as they take care of the other camp chores, such as hauling fresh water, gathering firewood, and cooking.

 

PERSPECTIVES (2  EACH):

  • The fisherman is acting morally in this case:  Aldrin P.; Dario T.
  •  What he’s doing is immoral: Thomas P.; Andrew M.

**12/3** Mac OS X ships with no ports open to the internet.  Windows XP ships with five ports open.  Microsoft’s decision means that it is easier for users to set up home networks, but it also makes XP mahines more vulnerable to attacks from internet worms.  Which policy is better?

PERSPECTIVES (2  EACH):

·        Apple’s  Edgar C,; Michael L.

·        Microsoft’s  David K.; Matt M.

 **12/8** Whether starving sailors in a lifeboat have an ethical and/or legal right to kill and eat one crewmember so that the others might survive? HINT: Can murder be justified by necessity, other than self-defense? What is the purpose of criminal law (retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation) and how would that be advanced? (Regina vs. Dudley, Stephens, et al)PERSPECTIVES (2 EACH)

  • ILLEGAL/UNETHICAL: Sofia S.; Jenny W.
  • LEGAL OR ETHICAL:  Ross N.; Mike S.